|
|
، جلد ۳، شماره ۳، صفحات ۱۰۷-۱۱۶
|
|
|
| عنوان فارسی |
|
|
| چکیده فارسی مقاله |
|
|
| کلیدواژههای فارسی مقاله |
|
|
| عنوان انگلیسی |
Diagnosis of Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis: A Review |
|
| چکیده انگلیسی مقاله |
Background and Aim: Upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (UEDVT) accounts for 1% to 4% of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) cases and can be associated with complications and mortality. This study aims to review the upper extremity DVT diagnosis methods and evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of commonly available diagnostic tests for upper extremity DVT that can be used to provide a combined diagnosis strategy.
Materials and Methods: Articles in this study, national databases, including Magiran, SID, and IranMedex, as well as international databases, including PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, and ISI databases, were searched for related books and articles. Keywords, including upper extremity deep vein thrombosis, thrombolysis, diagnosis, upper extremity deep vein thrombosis, thrombolysis, and diagnosis were searched and finally, 50 articles were reviewed.
Results: The accuracy of the D-dimer test for the diagnosis of UEDVT was evaluated in two studies. The sensitivity and specificity of D-dimer with a cut-off value of 500 micrograms per liter are 100% (95% confidence interval [CI], 78% to 100%), 14% (95% CI, 4% to 29%), 92% (95% CI), 73% to 99%), and 60% (95% CI, 52% to 67%). Duplex ultrasound has become the first line of diagnosis. The combined sensitivity and specificity of different ultrasound methods were, respectively, 84% (95% CI, 72% to 97%) and 94% (95% CI, 86% to 100%) for non-compression doppler ultrasound, 97% (95% CI, 90 to 100%) and 96% (95% CI, 87 to 100%) for compression ultrasound, and 91% (95% CI, 85 to 97%) and 93% (95% CI, 80 to 100%) for compression doppler ultrasound.
Conclusion: UEDVT is an increasing clinical problem and requires accurate and rapid diagnosis to prevent complications. Clinical suspicion should be confirmed by diagnostic imaging methods, such as duplex ultrasound, computed tomography (CT) scan, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). A diagnostic strategy based on sequential evaluation of clinical factors and D-dimer test can avoid imaging in about a quarter of patients. Ultrasound is widely used as a first-line imaging test and, if inconclusive, may be followed by a second ultrasound, CT venography, or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). |
|
| کلیدواژههای انگلیسی مقاله |
Upper extremity deep vein thrombosis, Diagnosis, Diagnostic imaging, Ultrasonography, Epidemiology, Mechanical thrombolysis |
|
| نویسندگان مقاله |
| Mohammad-Hossein Mokhtarian
Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Garmsar Branch, Islamic Azad University, Garmsar, Iran.
| Mohammad-Hossein Arjmandnia
Department of Pediatrics, School of Medicine, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
| Parham Rabiee
Department of Radiology, Rajaei Cardiovascular and Medical Research Center, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
| Sajjad Rezvan
Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
| Maryam Yousefi
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
| Amirali Fallahian
Research Committee of Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
| Fatemeh Rezvan
Student Research Committee, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
| Maliheh Rezaei Nayeh
Student Research Committee, Qom University of Medical Sciences, Qom, Iran.
|
|
| نشانی اینترنتی |
http://jvessels.muq.ac.ir/browse.php?a_code=A-10-111-4&slc_lang=fa&sid=1 |
| فایل مقاله |
فایلی برای مقاله ذخیره نشده است |
| کد مقاله (doi) |
|
| زبان مقاله منتشر شده |
fa |
| موضوعات مقاله منتشر شده |
cardiovascular diseases |
| نوع مقاله منتشر شده |
مروری |
|
|
|
برگشت به:
صفحه اول پایگاه |
نسخه مرتبط |
نشریه مرتبط |
فهرست نشریات
|